Second post! What are tests good for?
I recently came across a blog post
asking
What does a test “test”? Given that the last comment was from 2011 I am clearly late to the game
on this post, but it sparked some thinking on my part. To recap the post, the major thrust is that
tests do not measure what it is generally assumed they measure. To quote:
…. Tests are usually
thought to be reliable indicators (if not measures) of how well students
engage with the material being taught to them, and is often believed to be
related in some correlational way with their mathematical ability.
Where a student ranks – their class standing – on a test may
well be an indicator of both those things.
I want to argue, however, that what a test really tests is
the teacher. A test, in my view and experience, tests a teacher’s ability to
set a test at the “right” level…..
Franky [sic] I feel we put too much emphasis on tests and
examinations. My own preference is for more collaborative project work in which
students can exercise their ability to think, to reason, to plan, and to work
toward a goal, utilizing their skills and talents in conjunction with others.
First things first: my department has common post tests for each
class. The exam is roughly 20 questions
that cover the basic learning objectives for the course. We actually have created a test bank for the
questions to help with test security, but basically everyone is giving the same
exam. So that means in some sense I have
to train the students toward that even if I personally wanted to never give a
traditional exam.
In that vein, I first and foremost see tests as a deadline. So in that sense a test exams how well you
can learn when there is a deadline on learning the material. I see this as the difference between me
saying “You know, at some point I would like to learn about Project Based
Learning and use it in my classes,” and me saying “”I just put in a proposal to
discuss how I did Project Based Learning this coming semester.” The second forces me to plan my time
accordingly rather than keep putting it off.
(2) This relates to my second
idea about tests, they allow me as a teacher to know what the students know
when we launch into a new set of ideas.
So I have a test in my calculus classes over basic derivative rules
before we discuss chain rule. Then I
have some assurance that the students know the basic rules before we launch
into chain rule. Likewise, I have a test
over derivative rules before we get into relative extrema for many of the same
reasons. As every teacher knows, having
a test does not mean the students will all learn it, but having a deadline
seems to help.
(3) Third, I
think tests can be used as a measure of understanding. For example, after discussing the definition
of derivative and the idea of rates of change, the derivative as the slope of
the tangent line, and the basic derivative rules we have a test. On that test I typically include a question
like the following: (Very similar to a question from the Hughes-Hallett Applied Calculus)
The
growth graph in the following figure shows the height in inches of a bean plant
during 30 days. On the 15th
day, the plant was growing about _____ inches/day. Round to 2 decimal places.
In my mind, this question is asking a student to identify
the concept in a new area. In a real sense, this is also helping to
differentiate the A, B, and C students.
Almost all of the A students get this, a majority of the B students get
this, while a large number of the C students will answer 11/15 instead of
14/15.
(4) Tests can
also be a summative assessment.
Basically, I give a similar problem at the start, in the middle, and at
the end of the unit of material. Then I
measure how much the student progressed on the material. As I said above, at some point I have to
distinguish what this student knows about the material in order to assign a
grade. I may not like it, but that is
the way my job is set up right now.
(5) Finally,
(because I am tired of writing this, not because I have exhausted all of the
ideas behind testing!) there is a test as an indicator of limitations. You might think of this as showing off by the
instructor. As I say to my students, I
can write a test that would take me most of the class time, but that would kill
all of you. But what does that
prove? That I am better at this material
than you right now? We knew that at
already. I think this last point is some
of what the blog post is getting at.
To that end, I am trying out group tests in both my
statistics classes and my liberal arts classes this semester. I plan on posting about this in about a month
once the first couple of rounds are done.
